How ATS systems filter teacher applications
Australia's largest education employers process applications through employer-specific portals before a human panel reads anything. This guide explains how that screening works — and exactly what to do about it.
Jump to section
Australia's largest education employers now process teacher applications through employer-specific portals before a human panel reads anything. This applies across all eight states and territories — from NSW DoE's Oracle Taleo system to WA DoE's Jobs WA portal and ACT Education's STARRL-based statements. A well-qualified teacher with a poorly formatted application can be screened out before a principal ever sees their name. This guide explains how that screening works and exactly what to do about it.
1. How education employers actually process applications
The term "ATS screening" gets used loosely. For teacher applications, the process has two distinct stages, and understanding both changes what you prioritise.
Stage 1: System-level processing
When you submit a teaching application, it enters an employer-specific portal. At this stage, the system typically parses your document for completeness (are all required fields and attachments present?), applies keyword and phrase matching against the job advertisement and selection criteria, checks compliance with format rules (page limits, file type), and routes the application to the correct panel.
The extent of automated filtering depends on which platform the employer uses. NSW DoE uses iWorkforNSW, which runs on Oracle Taleo (confirmed by the iworkfornsw.taleo.net domain). QLD DoE uses the SmartJobs portal. VIC DET uses School Jobs Vic. Each handles applications differently. What they share: applications that fail format requirements or lack the expected keywords carry a higher risk of being deprioritised before any panel member opens them.
Stage 2: Human panel review
Shortlisted applications go to a selection panel, typically three or more members in government departments. The panel scores each response against the selection criteria, then ranks candidates for interview. References are checked and a recommendation goes to the principal or hiring manager.
The panel stage is where most career advice focuses: write compelling examples, demonstrate impact, use the STAR method. That advice is sound. But it only matters once your application clears Stage 1.
What this means in practice
Your supporting statement must do two jobs at once: pass system-level processing, and then persuade a human panel you are the right candidate. These goals are not at odds. The same features that help you clear ATS filtering — addressing every criterion, using the department's exact language, correct format — also make your application easier for a panel to score.
The common mistake. Most teachers write purely for one audience and ignore the other. A statement written only for humans may lack the specific phrases that pass system filtering. A statement written only for the system may read as keyword-stuffed to the panel. The strategies in this guide address both.
2. The APST framework: your primary keyword source
The Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APST) provide the national framework for teacher assessment in Australia. These 7 standards are the single most important source of terminology for any teaching application — every selection criterion you will see in an education job ad maps back to one or more of them.
The 7 standards and the phrases that matter
The standards are organised into three domains. The phrases below are not filler — they are the language selection criteria are written in. If a criterion says "demonstrated knowledge of and commitment to current trends in student wellbeing," your response needs to include phrases from Standard 4. Not synonyms: the actual APST language.
Professional Knowledge
| Std | Title | Key phrases to use in applications |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Know students and how they learn | "differentiated instruction," "student learning needs," "inclusive education," "evidence-based pedagogy," "understanding of student development" |
| 2 | Know the content and how to teach it | "[Key Learning Area] content knowledge," "pedagogical content knowledge," "curriculum design," "cross-curriculum priorities" |
Professional Practice
| Std | Title | Key phrases to use in applications |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Plan for and implement effective teaching | "lesson planning," "learning sequences," "assessment-informed planning," "high impact teaching strategies," "syllabus implementation" |
| 4 | Create and maintain supportive environments | "positive learning environment," "wellbeing," "behaviour management," "inclusive classroom," "child safe practices" |
| 5 | Assess, provide feedback, and report | "formative assessment," "summative assessment," "data-informed teaching," "student learning growth," "feedback to students and parents" |
Professional Engagement
| Std | Title | Key phrases to use in applications |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Engage in professional learning | "professional learning," "reflective practice," "ongoing professional development," "NESA accreditation" (NSW) |
| 7 | Engage professionally with colleagues and community | "collaborative relationships," "stakeholder engagement," "community partnerships," "professional communication" |
Department-specific terms that carry extra weight
Each state department adds language beyond APST. These phrases appear verbatim in their selection criteria and must appear verbatim in your response.
State-specific phrases — use exactly as written
3. Selection criteria format rules, by employer
Format rules are not suggestions. NSW DoE states explicitly that applications exceeding page limits "may be excluded." That is a system-level action, not a panel judgement.
NSW DoE — iWorkforNSW (Oracle Taleo)
PDF only, since 21 October 2020. Other formats including DOCX are not accepted. Minimum 10-point font with standard margins of approximately 2.5cm. Submit via iWorkforNSW only — email and paper applications are rejected.
| Role type | Criteria | Page limit |
|---|---|---|
| Classroom teacher (3 criteria) | Specific criteria only | 1.5 pages total |
| Classroom teacher (5 criteria) | Specific criteria only | 2.5 pages total |
| Executive (AP, Head Teacher, DP) | General criteria | 3 pages max |
| Executive | Each specific criterion | Half a page each |
| Principal | General criteria | 3 pages max |
| Principal | Each specific criterion | 1 page each |
VIC DET — School Jobs Vic
A significant change applies from 2025: classroom teachers and graduate teachers applying through the VIC DET Applicant Pool are no longer required to submit written responses to key selection criteria. KSC is instead addressed during the interview stage. For direct school vacancies, address the KSC in writing unless the application instructions state otherwise. Typical length is three-quarters to 1 page per criterion. Standard criteria are 5 (SC1–SC5), though individual schools vary.
QLD DoE — SmartJobs
The process runs in three stages: application review, a short recorded video interview, then vacancy matching. Page limits are not publicly documented — aim for three-quarters to 1 page per criterion as a guideline.
WA DoE — Jobs WA
The application format uses the 3 APST domains as headings, not individual selection criteria questions. Responses are limited to approximately 400 words per domain. Dot points are permitted given the word constraint. Where possible, include data or observations to support examples.
SA DoE — Edujobs
SA DoE requires an Applicant Profile and a Positioning Statement, both uploaded via Edujobs. The Positioning Statement addresses three questions listed in each individual job advertisement — questions vary by role. Page limits are not publicly documented; check the specific advertisement.
TAS DECYP — Jobs Tasmania
DECYP uses a Short Form Application (approximately 2 pages) that addresses the selection criteria from the Statement of Duties for each role. It is structured similarly to a cover letter: address the criteria in prose without repeating the question text. Permanent teaching pools are typically open June to July each year.
ACT Education — jobs.act.gov.au
The application requires a statement using the 7 APST Standards as sub-headings. The recommended format is STARRL (Situation, Task, Action, Result, Reflection, Link). For each standard, choose one or two focus areas and write to how you have met it.
| Role type | Statement length |
|---|---|
| Classroom teacher (permanent) | Maximum 3 pages |
| Casual classroom teacher | Maximum 2 pages |
ACT file format: Documents should be saved in Microsoft Word (.docx/.doc) or Rich Text Format (.rtf). PDF is not listed as an accepted format in the August 2025 applicant pack. Verify in the current advertisement before submitting.
NT DoE — eRecruit via Teach in the Territory
The standard application is a current CV and referee details (minimum two referees at principal or assistant principal level). Graduate applicants may substitute the final practicum report for referee letters. Page limits for CVs and covering statements are not publicly documented — check the specific vacancy advertisement. Cultural competency language carries significant weight in NT applications given the proportion of remote and Indigenous community schools.
Catholic systems
Catholic systems vary considerably and most do not use the same ATS platforms as government departments. For Catholic applications, cover letter quality carries more weight because ATS keyword filtering plays a smaller role — human judgement at shortlisting is the primary filter.
| System | Portal | What's expected |
|---|---|---|
| Sydney Catholic Schools | Own portal | CV + cover letter |
| Brisbane Catholic Education | SAP SuccessFactors | Online application form |
| Catholic Education SA (CESA) | Custom portal | CV + cover letter; shortlisted as received |
| Canberra & Goulburn Catholic | Workable | Online application |
| Parramatta Catholic | Own portal | CV + supporting statement |
4. The mistakes that cause qualified teachers to be screened out
The following table maps the most common application failures to their cause and fix.
| Mistake | Why it causes rejection | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Submitting a .pages file | Apple Pages cannot be parsed by any ATS | Export as PDF (NSW) or DOCX via File → Export To |
| Multi-column layout | ATS parsers read left-to-right; two columns become garbled | Single-column layout only |
| Criterion responses in a table | Table cells are read in unexpected order by parsers | Prose paragraphs, not tables |
| Key content in headers/footers | Some parsers do not read header/footer text | Put name, registration, and contact in the main body |
| Not addressing every criterion | System flags incomplete applications; panels score zero for unanswered criteria | Every criterion must have a response, even a brief one |
| First-use acronyms unexpanded | "NESA," "APST," "NCCD" may not match the full phrase in the job ad | Spell out on first use: "NSW Education Standards Authority (NESA)" |
| Using synonyms, not job-ad language | ATS matching is phrase-based, not concept-based | Use the exact noun phrases from criteria in your response |
| Exceeding page limits | NSW DoE states these applications "may be excluded" | Count pages before submitting; remove excess examples |
| Generic, untailored application | Panels identify these immediately; they score poorly on school-specific criteria | Name the specific school, role, and year levels in each application |
| Clichéd claims without evidence | "Passionate educator" is not evidence; panels score evidence | Every claim needs a specific, measurable example |
The two-minute plain-text test
After writing your statement in Word or Pages, paste the full text into a plain-text editor (Notepad on Windows; TextEdit in plain-text mode on Mac). If your formatting breaks down or words appear garbled, an ATS will have the same problem. Fix the formatting before you submit.
5. Writing a supporting statement that works for both ATS and humans
A supporting statement that clears ATS filtering and persuades a human panel follows a consistent structure for each criterion.
The structure
Opening sentence: Directly states your capability using the criterion's exact language.
This mirrors the criterion for ATS matching and tells the panel immediately that you are addressing the right topic. Follow with:
- Example 1 (STAR): A specific, concrete example from your teaching practice
- Example 2 (STAR, optional): A second example from a different context if the criterion is broad enough
- Closing link (optional): A brief sentence connecting your experience to the specific school
STAR in a teacher context
Situation — School type, year level, challenge or context
"In my Year 9 Mathematics class of 26 students at a regional comprehensive school, with a wide range of ability levels including 4 students with identified learning needs..."
Task — What you needed to achieve
"I needed to differentiate instruction to ensure all students could access the syllabus content while still being extended at their level..."
Action — Specific steps you took (your choices, not the team's)
"I designed tiered tasks based on pre-assessment diagnostic data, created modified problem sets for students working below stage level, and built in structured peer-explanation activities..."
Result — Measurable outcome — the most important and most often omitted component
"End-of-unit assessment showed 22 of 26 students achieved at or above expected growth; all 4 students with learning plans met their IEP numeracy targets for the term."
No result yet? If you cannot quantify a result (for example, in a prac context), use observable outcomes: "the cooperating teacher noted...", "students who had not previously volunteered contributions were actively participating by week 3."
What to avoid
- Do not start a response with a definition of the criterion ("This criterion addresses the teacher's ability to..."). It wastes words and reads as padding.
- Do not use bullet points within a criterion response. Prose is the convention and reads more naturally to human panels.
- Do not use "passionate" or "dedicated" without an immediately following specific example.
6. Putting it together: a pre-submission checklist
Before submitting any teacher application, run through these checks. An application that passes every item has addressed the most common ATS filtering and panel rejection causes.
Format
- File saved as PDF (NSW DoE) or DOCX/PDF as specified in the job ad
- Single-column layout; no tables, text boxes, or multi-column sections
- Minimum 10-point font with standard margins (NSW)
- Page limits checked for each criterion
- Plain-text test passed
Content
- Every selection criterion has a response
- All acronyms expanded on first use (NESA, APST, QCT, WWCC, NCCD, etc.)
- Exact phrases from the job ad and criteria used in responses
- APST standard language present (check against the table in Section 2)
- State-specific phrases included (e.g., Aboriginal Education Policy for NSW; DET values for VIC; cultural competence language for NT)
- Each example includes a specific, measurable result
Attachments
- All required documents attached (registration evidence, qualifications, WWCC, referee details)
- Resume included and updated for the role
- Cover letter included if required (Catholic and independent schools typically require one)
? Frequently asked questions
Do teaching jobs in Australia use ATS?
Yes, particularly in government departments. NSW DoE uses iWorkforNSW (Oracle Taleo); QLD DoE uses SmartJobs; VIC DET uses School Jobs Vic; WA DoE uses Jobs WA; SA DoE uses Edujobs; TAS DECYP uses Jobs Tasmania; ACT Education uses jobs.act.gov.au; NT DoE uses eRecruit. Catholic systems vary — Brisbane Catholic Education uses SAP SuccessFactors; others use simpler portals. Independent schools are the least likely to use automated filtering.
What are the most important keywords for a teacher application?
Start with the exact phrases in the job advertisement and selection criteria — these are what the system is configured to match. Then build from APST: differentiated instruction, high impact teaching strategies, formative and summative assessment, student learning growth, data-informed teaching, professional learning, collaborative relationships. Spell out all Key Learning Areas in full, not abbreviations.
Does Victoria require addressing key selection criteria in writing?
VIC DET's official policy says it is not required, but the practical expectation for most positions is to address KSC. From 2025, teachers applying through the VIC DET Applicant Pool are explicitly not required to address KSC in writing — it is addressed at interview. For direct school vacancies, address the KSC in writing unless the application instructions say otherwise.
What file format should I use for my teacher application?
NSW DoE requires PDF only — do not submit DOCX. For VIC DET, QLD DoE, and most Catholic portals, DOCX or PDF are both accepted; check the specific job advertisement. ACT Education's applicant pack specifies DOCX or RTF, not PDF. If you use Apple Pages or LibreOffice, export to PDF before submitting. The .pages and .odt formats are not reliably parsed by any ATS.
How long should selection criteria responses be for teacher jobs?
NSW DoE classroom teacher: half an A4 page per criterion (3 criteria = 1.5 pages total; 5 criteria = 2.5 pages). VIC DET: three-quarters to 1 page per criterion is typical. QLD DoE does not publish a page limit; aim for three-quarters to 1 page. Do not pad responses to fill the limit — panels recognise padding and it does not improve your score.
What happens after the ATS shortlist in a teacher application?
A human selection panel reviews shortlisted applications, scores each response against the criteria, then invites candidates to interview. References are contacted after the interview in most departments. The panel makes a recommendation to the principal or hiring manager, who makes the final offer.
Check your application before you submit. Teacher Passport's ATS Prep tool reviews your application against a role's selection criteria — it identifies which criteria you've addressed, flags missing keywords, and shows where responses need strengthening.
Ready to Work?
Browse teaching jobs across every sector
Teacher Passport lists government, Catholic, and independent school jobs across Australia — updated daily from official sources. Filter by state, sector, subject area, and employment type.
Browse Teaching Jobs